Isn’t the best example of a controversial political party, the nazi party?
And wouldn’t it be best to learn from the masters?
“To follow the path, look to the master, follow the master, walk with the master, see through the master, become the master.” - Zen Proverb
At the moment we are currently making decisions on what sounds good, but wouldn’t it be better to learn from people that have rose to power before and use their techniques, because that’s how anyone becomes an expert in anything right? You learn from the master and improve on what they did, your decisions shouldn’t be based on what you think sounds good, they should be based on what has been proven to work. The Nazi’s and the swedish pirate party are good examples of successful parties, other than them the only parties that have been in power have been OWO, learning from other parties is the first step to rise to power, the Nazi’s had a great propaganda campaign, they managed to sway the minds of those in Nazi germany and got what they wanted.
The Nazi party were students of gustave le bon, he wrote many books on influencing public opinion, it was a science and it had been proven to work, they did rise to power because they knew scientifically what worked and didn’t, they didn’t just base their political efforts what they thought was right, nor did they use reason alone to make decisions, they learnt from people before them, the problem with reason is that it creates illusive theories and is ilimited to the knowledge you have, you can only reason with what you know, creating conclusions from premises, wouldn’t it be simpler to just take what’s already been proved to work and do that?
So why don’t we do the same?